May 23, 2013

Wilpons: Ponzi scheme escape artists

Like always when you start to dig around the Mets, things start to stink. An interesting article in the New York Times today outlines that the Madoff Ponzi Scheme may not have been the first illegal investing scheme that the Wilpons escaped with a profit.

Their survival of the previous scheme was so concerning that they settled out of court with the victims of the Samuel Israel III Bayou ponzi scheme.

But for the owners, Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz, it is not the first time they have had their names and personal fortunes roughed up in a Ponzi scheme. An investment firm started by the two men had to pay back nearly $13 million two years ago when a hedge fund run by the scion of a wealthy New Orleans family collapsed in what was then regarded as one of Wall Street’s more brazen frauds.

It seems the common thread in the two scandals is the fact that it’s felt the Wilpons at the least should have known something wasn’t right. It sure seems that they did considering they were able to withdraw their money just in time before the funds collapsed.

According to two lawyers involved in the case against the Mets, the trustee, Irving H. Picard, argued in a lawsuit filed in December that the history of Wilpon and Katz’s dealings with Madoff meant they knew or should have known it might be a scheme, and that, as a result, other victims were entitled to hundreds of millions of dollars above and beyond what Sterling Stamos might have made as profits. “Some of the legal principles adopted in Bayou are the same ones that the trustee is applying,” said Richard Kirby, the lead lawyer for the creditors committee in the Bayou case.

At the very least this is NOT looking good for the Wilpon family. Even if they are not criminally liable for any of their actions, it sure seems as though this trustee is after large sums of money from them. All the money aside this has already been a huge embarrassment for the family name and from the looks of it continue to get worse.

The Wilpons and Madoff had business dealings going back and forth for a long time. Madoffs wife was invested in several ventures by Wilpon owned companies. This tangle of investments will make it very hard to settle and is the reason many think the Madoff trustee could be targeting up to a billion dollars in a lawsuit directed at the Wilpons.

Let’s just hope that in this case the old saying of “where there is smoke there is fire” proves to be false.

Buzz: Mets must pursue Cliff Lee

I have heard/read a few times today how Cliff Lee of the slumping Seattle Mariners might be available. First Ken Davidoff had a nice article for Newsday saying:

So if Seattle makes Cliff Lee available, the Mets should be all over that. They have a deeper farm system now, giving them more trade chips, and they can replenish it (if they trade someone) with the seventh overall pick in this upcoming draft, as long as they’re willing to pay more than Major League Baseball’s slotted figure.

It’s a nice idea considering the price tag shouldn’t be that high considering he is in the last year of his contract. That also works out well as he would be highly motivated. Not to mention if the Mets were to bring him back, I am sure he would have a little bit of a chip on his shoulder after the way that the Phillies dumped him in favor of the hotter chick in Roy Halladay.

I then heard Mike Francesa talking about it on WFAN saying he thought that Lee would be available for 2-3 “good” prospects.  Take his analysis lightly as Mike often proves to have no idea what he’s talking about in these matters, but the fact remains that the buzz is that Lee is available and if that’s true the Mets have to get the deal done.

It just makes sense for so many reasons.  The Mets should work out a deal with Seattle and ask for 2-3 days to work out a contract extension and make the deal happen.  I don’t see why Lee would balk at the deal either.  He had great success pitching in the NL last year with the Phillies, and it’s about time we saw some benefit from playing in a park where long-balls go to die.

I don’t want to hear about payroll concerns.  I don’t want to hear about protecting our prospects.  The Mets are in dire need of a pitcher and here is one available at a relatively reasonable price.  If it means we have to say bye bye to F-Mart then I am willing to sign on the line.  The potential contract extension can not be a factor, the Mets brass have to understand they need to invest money into this team, and if they do they will see it returned in attendance when they field a good team.  They have to be concerned by the lack of juice around this team, especially in the lackluster attendance numbers at this point.  They need a shot in the arm, and acquiring an arm like Cliff Lee would be a perfect fit.

Mets pursuing Bronson Arroyo

Filed in the “Duh” department, it appears that the Mets are in pursuit of Bronson Arroyo.  Mike Pignataro over at SevenTraintoShea.com reports:

Yesterday, the Mets had a scout in attendance at the Dodgers-Reds game scouting Reds RHPBronson Arroyo.

According to a source, the Mets have interest in Arroyo at this time. The source believes Arroyo would be a good fit for the Mets and Citi Field as he pitches to contact.

I am on that thinks Arroyo would be a good fit with the Mets. Yes I know he is nothing remarkable but he is a steady arm that I think would fit well into Citi Field. This guy always makes at least 30 starts and 200+ innings a season and that’s something we definitely need. Is he a bona fide #2 starter, probably not, but he would definitely be a stabilizing force in an otherwise shaky rotation.

It’s all about what it will take the land him, and it seems it would probably take a lower level prospect with a good upside.  I don’t think that would be a large obstacle to a deal getting done, especially if Pelfrey, Maine, or Ollie stumble out of the gate.  Couple that with the fact that Minaya’s job security will be largely determined by how this rotation performs, I think there is a good possibility of this deal happening at some point.

Rumor: Pujols for Howard trade

And no I am not talking about in my fantasy baseball league.

Rumors coming out of ESPN are that several sources are saying there may be talk between the Philadelphia Phillies and the St Louis Cardinals about a potential swap of the prolific sluggers.

Both sides have flatly denied the rumors and say no talks have taken place nor will they.

The reason the discussion is even taking place is due to the fact that the Cardinals have been unable to lock up Pujols to a long term extension and general opinion is that he will be looking for a mega-deal in the Alex Rodriguez category.  Some wonder if St Louis can afford Prince Albert and so perhaps they would entertain a deal like this.

I don’t really understand it myself.  St Louis is a great baseball market and a storied franchise, it’s not like they are a poor team.  And maybe if they had worries they couldn’t afford keeping their own star player, why would they have spent so damn much for Holliday?  Trades like this rarely ever take place, especially straight up like this.  I know Howard is a St. Louis guy and considered a local hero there, but I think this is just reaching too far.

I was surprised when I looked at it that Howard is actually older then Pujols too.  Just shows you how young Pujols was when he started to tear up the league, I thought he was several years older.

Buster Olney explains several good reasons a deal might make sense, but I just don’t see it happening.  It’s interesting stuff to talk about but I’d have serious doubts it would ever happen.

Are the Mets Broke?

The latest buzz making the rounds is once again that the Mets are broke.  Not just the Wilpons, but the Mets.  Ken Rosenthal and John Morosi are reporting for FoxSports.com that the Mets are out of money:

The Mets, outbid by the Padres for catcher Yorvit Torrealba, are out of money, major-league sources say — a curious position for a team that spent $66 million on outfielder Jason Bay knowing it had other needs.

Now as much as we all in Mets-land may bitch and moan about how cheap the Wilpons (I personally love the term Coup-ons) have acted, it just doesn’t really add up.  I tend to agree with Matthew Cerrone over at MetsBlog.com when he says that:

i can’t say whether this is true or not; but, it is peculiar that the team had earmarked $12 million for Joel Pineiro and Bengie Molina, yet, since the two players signed elsewhere, there has been talk of the team being unable to spend on players like Ben Sheets or even Yorvit Torrealba or barajas, who would cost only a million bucks or so…

…that said, i do not think money is reason for not signing John Lackey or pineiro, or molina, all of whom i think they had a set value on, and refused to go beyond… i understand how this could be viewed as being cheap, but i think it’s actually a matter of not overvaluing mediocre talent…

I tend to think that despite the swirling rumors the Mets aren’t actually broke.  At the worst maybe they have a bit of a liquidity problem, but hell who doesn’t right now?  I just think they up in their lofty offices think they have a plan and think are so just so smart and have placed value on players and are trying to play hardball.

They have won with this stance before if you remember K-Rod from last off season.  But the problem is that this team has many more holes then was perceived last year.  For a team with several gaping holes in their roster, it’s starting to look very strange that they spend $66 million on Jason Bay, and that taps out their war-chest to fill other holes?

Truth is I can’t believe this because if true, things are much worse over at CitiField then even I could imagine.